Blog

In this epochal book, Immanuel Velikovsky, one of the great scientists of modern times, puts the complete histories of our Earth and of humanity on a new basis. Immanuel Velikovsky was a Russian independent scholar who wrote a number of . Earth in Upheaval () dealt with geological evidence for global natural. 5 Feb Immanuel Velikovsky’s third book on catastrophism in geology.

In BCE, he claims Mars did likewise. Leroy Ellenbergerin his A Lesson from Velikovsky.

Immanuel Velikovsky

The son of Shimon Simon Yehiel Velikovsky — and Beila Grodensky, he learned several languages as a child and was sent away to study velikovaky the Medvednikov Gymnasium in Moscowwhere he performed well in Russian and mathematics. There continues to be some controversy over to what extent the Biblical account can or cannot be reconciled with the archaeological and other independent evidence, although the specific solutions put forward by Velikovsky seem to have few supporters these days.

His criticisms are available in Scientists Confront Velikovsky [35] and as a corrected and revised version in the book Broca’s Brain: Shapley threatened to organise a US-wide boycott of Macmillan’s textbooks if they did not drop the book. Shapley threatened to organise a textbook boycott of Macmillan for upyeaval publication of Worlds in Collisionand within two months the book was transferred to Doubleday.

Velikovsky is not so much the first of the new catastrophists. The fundamental criticism against this book from the astronomy community was that its celestial mechanics were physically impossible, requiring planetary orbits that do not conform with the laws of conservation of energy and conservation of angular momentum. As Stephen Jay Gould pointed out in his essay Velikovsky in Collisionwhile Velikovsky’s objections were shared at veliklvsky time by some orthodox geologists i.

As noted above, Velikovsky had conceived the broad sweep of this material by the early s. See the main article on this topic: Roy rated it it was amazing Jul 05, Some of Velikovsky’s specific postulated catastrophes included: I have readl all of IVs books several times. With the financial support of his father, Velikovsky edited and published two volumes of scientific papers translated into Hebrew. It was claimed, starting with early erath, that Velikovsky’s usage of material for proof is often very selective.

One such document was the Ipuwer Papyruswhich he felt reported events similar to several of the Biblical plagues.

Velikovsky argued that the conventional chronology of the Near East and classical world, based upon Egyptian Sothic dating and the king lists of Manethowas wholly flawed. However, his book was much more entertaining, though equally wonky.

Rivers and seas boiling! Another fantastic development of Velikovsky’s planetary science centres around Saturnand the novel notion velijovsky Earth orbited it within human memory, before the Sun came along and spoiled everything, never mind that the Sun preceded them both. Indeed, in a splendid piece of circular logicVelikovsky would often re-date sources, claiming that those which appeared to describe the same “events” must be contemporaneous.

Velikovsky’s Ages in Chaos series provided a starting point for a plethora of armchair scholars to devise new and exciting chronologies for Egypt, the Near and Middle East, and even Europe. The controversy created by Velikovsky’s publications may have helped revive the catastrophist movement in the second half of the 20th century; however, it is also held by some working in the field that progress has actually been retarded by the negative aspects of the so-called Velikovsky Affair.

Inspite – or even because – of the disgraceful hostility, immamuel by his theories, this book keeps being of ardent topicality, which in the light of recent scientific research is even growing.

Immanuel Velikovsky Collection : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive

However, tree-ring expert Mike Baillie would give credit to Velikovsky after disallowing the impossible aspects of Worlds in Collision: For most of the s and early s, Velikovsky was persona non grata on college and university campuses. Worth a read if you actually know earth processes and history to see the logic behind the incorrect theories, but I wouldn’t recommend if this is your first exposure to such topics.

While James credits Velikovsky with “point[ing] the way to a solution by challenging Egyptian chronology”, he severely criticised the contents of Velikovsky’s chronology as “disastrously extreme”, producing “a rash of new problems far more severe than those it hoped to solve” and claiming that “Velikovsky understood little of archaeology and nothing of stratigraphy. He pointed out that the chronology of Egypt, with its Old, Middle and New Kingdoms and dynastic lists of Pharaohs had been taken as the yard stick against which that of the rest of the region was matched against.

Community Saloon bar To do list What is going on? May 29, Jason rated it it was ve,ikovsky. Earlier, he played a role in the founding of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem in Israel, and was a respected psychiatrist and psychoanalyst. This came to the attention of Shapley, who opposed the publication of the work, having been ewrth familiar with Velikovsky’s claims through the pamphlet Velikovsky had given him. Velikovsky’s revised chronology has been rejected by nearly all mainstream historians and Egyptologists.

In its way this book is as interesting as Worlds in Collision; ijmanuel, I found Worlds of Collision to be more compelling because of the inclusion of the human historical documentation along with the cold scientific facts, which is why I gave this velikovsly stars instead of five. Towards the end, Velikovsky questioned the methods used to date the end of the last ice agesuggesting that it may have taken place significantly more recently than the conventional date of around 10, years ago, and he seemed to be toying rather cautiously with the idea that it may have taken place as recently as the catastrophe which he believed took place around BCE.

Earth in Upheaval | The Velikovsky Encyclopedia

Velikovsky’s bestselling, and as a consequence most criticized, book is Worlds in Collision. The History of a Public Controversy. This project was a cornerstone in the formation of the Hebrew University of Jerusalemas the fledgling university was able to donate copies of the Scripta to the libraries of other academic institutions in exchange for complimentary copies of publications from those institutions.

Culture and Biography as Ideational Determinants. Somewhere in his writings you might find the word “God”, but you might have to look long and hard before you found it. Just has good has Worlds in Collisions, some think impossible, but maybe not since we can not go back. If the ice Age is not an outright fraud, if uniform change is not the blissful dream of a peace-loving scientist, if evolution is not an outdated euphemism, these concepts are certainly at hopeless odds with the facts adduced by Velikovsky.

In Defence of Science: To ask other readers questions about Earth In Upheavalplease sign up.