BIOINITIATIVE REPORT 2012 PDF

Media. Each of the links below opens a PDF file in a new browser window. BioInitiative Report Issues New Warnings on Wireless and EMF. Information about the BioInitiative Report for press.

Author: Fenrisida Faugrel
Country: Botswana
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Environment
Published (Last): 25 December 2009
Pages: 435
PDF File Size: 2.15 Mb
ePub File Size: 19.64 Mb
ISBN: 143-8-16035-648-2
Downloads: 53692
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Maunos

Picking Cherries in Science: The Bio-Initiative Report

In addition risk calculations based on estimated absorbed dose give strength to the findings. The ACRBR also points out there are statements in the report that do not accord with the standard view of science, and the report does not provide a reasonable account of why we should reject the standard view in favour of the views espoused in the report.

It should be anticipated that some part of the human population, such as children, pregnant women and groups of hypersensitive persons could be especially sensitive to the non-thermal microwave exposures.

Over four billion people around the world now use cell phones. The BIR has long been criticized by health agencies for slant. The brain contains a population of oscillators with distributed natural frequencies, which pull one another into synchrony the circadian pacemaker cells. There are fewer animal studies that have studied effects of cell phone radiation on female fertility parameters.

Also, one might question the relevance of a small biological effect reported in nematodes in response to mild heating to human health. Evidence for Stress Response: Sunlight contains little RF energy, but about half of the solar energy that bipinitiative the earth is in the infrared part of the spectrum, which is just above the radiofrequency region considered by the BIR.

Research has shown thresholds are very low safety standards must be reduced to limit biological responses. The BioInitiative Reportconcludes that the existing standards for public safety are completely inadequate to bioinititive your health.

This page was last edited on 18 Aprilat For example, several independent studies have reported minor changes in brain wave activity associated with use of a mobile phone handset. As might be expected from a compilation of separately authored chapters done at two points in time, the BIR is inconsistent in approach and content. World-renowned expert on the safety of wireless, radiofrequency and microwave radiation.

Related Posts  LA ENZIMA PARA REJUVENECER EPUB

This is based on weak epidemiological evidence that children living in homes near power lines, or long-term users of mobile phones, have a slightly increased risk of, respectively, leukemia and brain tumors.

Bioinitiative Report

The BioInitiative Report is available at: The designation applies to low-intensity RFR in general, covering all RFR-emitting devices and exposure sources cell and cordless phones, WI-FI, wireless laptops, wireless hotspots, electronic baby monitors, wireless classroom access points, wireless antenna facilities, etc.

In that study, exposure to low-level microwave radiation caused nematodes a kind of worm to express heat shock proteins. In many respects this scientific literature is uneven 202 confused. Evidence for Repport Cancers Leukemia — Dr.

Most of the real signals that are in use in mobile communication have not been tested so far. New standards should bioiintiative developed based on knowledge of mechanisms of non-thermal effects. If no mid-course corrections are made to existing repoft outdated safety limits, such delay will magnify the public health impacts with even more applications of wireless-enabled technologies exposing even greater populations around the world in daily life.

Evidence for Genotoxic Effects — Dr. EMF stimulates stress proteins indicating an assault on the cell. Parents must decide whether possible health risks to their children outweigh the convenience of keeping track of them. The effect has no clear health significance, and it is still an open question whether it is directly caused by exposure to RF fields or some other factor associated with exposure.

Animal studies have demonstrated oxidative and DNA damage, pathological changes in the testes of animals, decreased sperm mobility and viability, and other measures of deleterious damage to the male germ line Dasdag et al, ; Yan et al, ; Otitoloju et al, ; Salama et al, ; Behari et bioinitjative, ; Kumar et al, Table — Conclusions The science bioinitiatlve very strong and we should pay attention.

Related Posts  SARMANUL DIONIS PDF

Sperm cannot repair DNA damage. The Precautionary Principle — Mr. From October to August14 scientists and public health experts worked to come up with recommendations for the Bioinitiative Report.

But the analogy with climate change is the exact opposite of the impression they are trying to make. New public health standards and limits are needed. Ultimately, the question reduces to the quality of judgments on what is, by all accounts, a mixed and in places contradictory scientific literature.

However, the evidence given in the report cannot be ignored and hence, need further investigation in this area. A new report by the BioInitiative Working Group says that evidence for risks to health has substantially increased since from electromagnetic fields and wireless technologies radiofrequency radiation.

When you are done with a particular file, closing the window will bring you back to this page. The BfS conducted a preliminary review of the so-called “BioInitiative Report” immediately after its release and concluded that it had clear scientific shortcomings.

Table of Contents

Many of the reported effects were small, close to the level of background variability and small compared to potential artifacts and hence difficult to identify reliablywith no particular relevance to health. Sage Statement of the Problem — Ms. Sufficient evidence from epidemiological studies of an increased risk from exposure to EMF power frequency magnetic fields that cannot be attributed to chance, bias or confounding.

The coiled-coil structure of DNA in the nucleus makes the molecule react like a fractal antenna to a wide range of frequencies.